LET'S TALK SENSE ABOUT SEX AND SEXUALITY

Here at the Alexandria Daily Poop we do not believe that discrimination against homosexual persons in employment, accommodation, or housing should be lawful, except of course by religious institutions and private associations (such as the Boy Scouts).  Refusal to rent to, sell to, hire or otherwise accommodate should be based on something germaine to the situation (such as a bad credit history, disorderly conduct, unfitness for the job, whatever. We object to "drug screening" for any reason other than to test for actual intoxication, too.)

 

But we are kind of corked over this whole push to make every damn bizarre thing you can think of a "right". Back in the late 60s it was "gays". "Gays" generally meant female homosexuals, too; but in the 70s lesbians started demanding to be recognized as a distinct part of the gay community (what community? but, never mind...).

 

Then the "bisexuals" piped up that they wanted recognition as a distinct part of "gaydom" too. So the construct "Lesbian, Gay (ladies first? That seems a bit chauvanistic, but again, never mind...) and Bisexual" was born.

 

Oh, but this business is so complicated, and to be "politically correct"; every little fringe group has to be granted recognition. And hanging around the fringes of the "LGB" community was a group of people who actually believed themselves to be "women in men's bodies" or "men in women's bodies". These folks were at first called "trans-sexuals"; but some of them were partway through a "sex-change"; some had had "The operation" and some were either too poor to afford it or were leery about going through with it.

 

And at first these were called "pre-op" and "post-op" trans-sexuals. But about fifteen years ago someone hit on the idea of calling the whole lot "transgendered persons".  (of course, "gender" means the masculine or feminine nature of a word. but as we said in the last article this is an attack on the language). This "transgendered" business mystifies us. After all, allegedly here you have a person who wants to become a heterosexual female (or male) but feels "trapped" in a male (or female) body. Why are they included in the homosexual community?

 

Well, this has resulted in the current construct of LGBT, which former First Lady and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton used to describe the people who want "gay marriage".  But it is rather strange to hear a national leader talk about "LGBT people" isn't it??  If you didn't know it, you'd think she was talking about space aliens.

 

Sadly, the confusion doesn't end there. In their quest to be as "inclusive" as possible; the gay activists have extended the "big tent of homosexuality" to include those who are "questioning and curious".  Thus the full current construct for the "gay community" is "LGBTQC". Which begs the question of why public pronouncements leave out the "QC"? 

 

Well, we here at the Alexandria Daily Poop are pretty sure this "questioning/curious" business is an attempt by the activists pushing this garbage to draw in youth to be indoctrinated.  And as for this "bisexual" business,  well, we suppose you could be attracted to members of your own and the opposite sex at the same time or to different degrees. But practically speaking, any amount of homo is all gay. Call your self "Bi"? Well. Obama is "biracial" but everyone calls him black. Right? Same difference.

 

What is really jarring is this "T" in the LGBT. Somewhere along the line, enough people started tolerating the idea that there was such a thing as a person with the physical sexual characteristics of one sex actually being a person of the other sex trapped in an "inappropriate" body. The ultimate paradigm of this idiocy would be Chaz Bono and her new penis (for which she probably needs to take anti-rejection drugs in order to keep her body from destroying) dancing around with Lady GaGa and singing that she's "on the right track, baby (she) was born this way".

 

Chaz was so not "born this way".

 

If you were born with a dick between your legs, and you think you are a woman YOU HAVE A SCREW LOOSE. What would you think if some guy thought he was a fish and paid a gazillion dollars to have gills installed so he could live and breathe under water?  And the same goes for women who "feel" that they are men.

 

And it's strange - or probably not, when one thinks about it - that the nations on this planet where such nonsense is being foisted off as "enlightenment" are the very nations which are a bulwark against tyrannical aggressor nations; which do NOT put up with such weakening influences.

 

Men - be they gay or straight - should be men, and women - lesbian or otherwise - should be wimmeny. The aim of those behind this "gay marriage" and "transgender" crapola are useful idiots who seek to weaken the fortress protecting true freedom. After the walls have been breached and the "liberated" people have been put to the sword, a thousand years of darkness will descend.

 

The world is a dangerous place. There is no room for this nonsense about "transgendered" people and "gay marriage".  Let us be understanding to the troubled souls among us. But let us not surrender the serious business of running and maintaining a free and open society to a pack of rainbow-and-unicorn shitheads.

 

Should we do this; or to be more accurately should we continue down this path; then soon the barbarians will overrun us. And the first to die by the barbarians' hands will be the "transgendered" and the "married" gay couples.

 

You had better think about the truths we have written here. Because they are truths, and no amount of liberal-schmiberal nattering will change that.